2293 HAWES AVE, DALLAS, TX, 75235
$74,000,000
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 3.1% from prior year
Refinance stress and operational disconnect present near-term risk; downward valuation pressure and affordability mismatch argue for watch-list positioning pending debt maturity clarity.
West Love's 60.3% LTV and $44.6M Capital One loan (maturity unknown) create a 12–24 month refinance trigger at elevated rates—the $5.4M delta between appraised value ($74.0M) and estimated sale price ($68.6M) already signals 7.2% cap rate compression. The submarket delivers 18.4% YoY rent growth, yet West Love lags posted comparables by 31–45% ($1.0K–$1.1K vs. $1.4K–$1.6K), and demographic analysis reveals critical affordability misalignment: the 1-mile tenant pool shows 32.3% rent-to-income ratio (above 28–30% threshold) with 44.9% earning under $50K, forcing dependence on higher-income 3–5 mile draws that limits lease velocity. Google reviews expose a management gap—74.1% five-star leasing-staff praise masks 15.5% one-star resident complaints on security, maintenance, and noise, signaling strong sales execution but weak operations and retention. Photo analysis confirms 40% of units remain in original 2016 spec, offering tactical renovation upside, though the property's 56 Walk Score and car-dependent positioning constrain rent growth absent density or employment catalyst.
Directional Read: Watch-List – Obtain loan documents to confirm maturity and rate terms; conduct third-party condition audit and resident interviews to validate operational friction beneath Google ratings; reassess only if debt maturity extends 3+ years or property demonstrates path to 1-mile affordability correction through selective renovation targeting higher-income submarket anchors.
No notes yet
Experience Comfort and Convenience Near Dallas Love Field Airport
Luxury Apartments Made with Love – Follow Your Heart Home
Interior Finishes & Renovation Status
West Love's unit mix reflects a programmatic upgrade cycle rather than wholesale renovation. 65 of 126 photos show upgraded or premium finishes—predominantly white quartz countertops (12 instances), modern slab/shaker cabinetry in gray tones, and stainless steel appliances—clustered in the 2018–2023 renovation window. However, 7 builder-grade observations and vinyl plank flooring across 18 photos suggest either original 2016 construction or selective unit upgrades, not a building-wide capital refresh. The consistency data points to a mixed portfolio: primary/model units appear premium; secondary stock likely remains original.
Exterior & Amenity Position
Mid-rise podium architecture (54 observations) with white fiber cement/brick and contemporary detailing presents strong curb appeal. Resort-caliber pool amenities with landscaped courtyards and deck lounging, plus recessed/LED accent lighting throughout common areas, position this as solid Class B bordering Class B+. No deferred maintenance red flags noted; 71 "excellent" condition observations confirm well-maintained envelope and grounds.
Value-Add Thesis
The 368-unit portfolio has meaningful renovation optionality: ~40% of units remain in original 2016 spec or partial upgrade status. Staged kitchen/bath refreshes (white quartz, gray cabinetry, stainless tiers) can drive NOI uplift without full gut-rehab costs, provided market rents support the $2018–2020 refresh economics.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
West Love Apartments has weak walkability fundamentals that misalign with its sub-$1.1K rent positioning. A Walk Score of 56 and Transit Score of 45 classify this location as car-dependent, limiting appeal to transit-oriented renters willing to pay premium rates. At $1,093.50/month, the property targets price-sensitive tenants who typically prioritize affordability over urban amenities—a tenant profile that actually tolerates suburban car dependency. However, the lack of nearby employment density or transit access constrains upside rent growth and limits the pool of downtown commuters. This location works only if unit density, operational efficiency, or neighborhood appreciation can offset the walkability drag.
No notes yet
Pipeline poses minimal near-term rent pressure but warrants monitoring. At 6.5% of West Love's 368-unit base, the 24 nearby units represent manageable competitive supply—well below the 15-20% threshold that typically pressures occupancy. However, the permitting timeline is concerning: 14 of 24 projects are in active review, inspection, or payment-due phases, suggesting 18-36 month deliveries that will coincide with the current market downturn (submarket vacancy already deteriorating). The concentration of permits around Shea Road and Hall Street indicates these are likely direct neighborhood competitors rather than geographically dispersed projects. Recommend tracking the three projects in inspection phase (LUCAS DR, LOVEDALE AVE, MAIL AVE) closest to delivery.
| Distance | Address | Description | Status | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.3 mi | 2143 SHEA RD | QTEAM MEETING TBD Condo/townhome project with 5 units in ... | Payment Due | Mar 11, 2026 |
| 0.3 mi | 2147 SHEA RD | QTEAM MEETING TBD Condo/townhome project with 5 units in ... | Payment Due | Mar 11, 2026 |
| 0.4 mi | 2030 SHEA RD | 11 Condos New construction | Permit About to Expire | Aug 21, 2023 |
| 0.4 mi | 2247 MAIL AVE | 2247 Mail Ave - New MFD project for a 3 story 5-unit town... | Inspection Phase | Nov 05, 2024 |
| 0.4 mi | 2243 LOVEDALE AVE | 2243 Lovedale - New construction of a 6 unit townhome | Plan Review | Jul 30, 2025 |
| 0.4 mi | 2033 SHEA RD | New Construction. 5 unit condo building | Inspection Phase | Nov 13, 2024 |
| 0.4 mi | 2204 LOVEDALE AVE | New Construction of 5-unit condo building | Inspection Phase | Feb 18, 2025 |
| 0.5 mi | 2155 MAIL AVE | Commercial new construction (5) unit multifamily developm... | Inspection Phase | Feb 11, 2025 |
| 0.7 mi | 2710 KIMSEY DR | New MFD project for a 3 story 5 unit townhome apartment c... | Plan Review | Jan 22, 2025 |
| 0.7 mi | 2702 KIMSEY DR | THE ASTRID APARTMENTS PROJECT WILL BE A NEW, THREE-STORY ... | In Review | Aug 29, 2025 |
| 1.4 mi | 3700 INWOOD RD | QTEAM MEETING Senior Living community with independent li... | Inspection Phase | May 28, 2025 |
| 1.6 mi | 4739 GRETNA ST | 18 Townhouses in 2 phases. 9 units each phase. PHASE 1 BU... | Inspection Phase | Jan 15, 2025 |
| 1.9 mi | 2514 LUCAS DR | (1131) MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING / 5 UNIT MULTIFAMILY | Inspection Phase | Feb 24, 2025 |
| 1.9 mi | 4501 AFTON ST | Residential use | Inspection Phase | Nov 23, 2021 |
| 2.0 mi | 2723 HONDO AVE | New construction, multifamily.6 dwelling units. | Inspection Phase | Nov 27, 2024 |
| 2.0 mi | 2314 ARROYO AVE | he proposed work includes the construction of three-story... | In Review | Sep 16, 2025 |
| 2.0 mi | 2811 HONDO AVE | New construction of 12 unit townhome on two lots; 6 units... | Inspection Phase | Jul 16, 2021 |
| 2.2 mi | 4330 DICKASON AVE | New construction of multi-family// 4330 Dickason. | Plan Review | Jun 29, 2022 |
| 2.5 mi | 4013 N HALL ST | QTEAM MEETING 7.17.2025 8 unit multifamily new construction | Payment Due | Jun 17, 2025 |
| 2.5 mi | 4011 N HALL ST | QTEAM MEETING 7.22.2025 - 8 unit multifamily new construc... | Payment Due | Jun 17, 2025 |
| 2.5 mi | 4005 N HALL ST | QTEAM MEETING - 7.23.2025 - 8 unit multifamily new constr... | Payment Due | Jun 17, 2025 |
| 2.6 mi | 3900 LEMMON AVE | New construction of MFD project. 406 dwelling units with ... | Revisions Required | Aug 21, 2024 |
| 2.8 mi | 3555 DICKASON AVE | Q-Team Migrated NEW 4 LEVEL ABOVE GRADE GARAGE(1-3.5).LEV... | Payment Due | Mar 24, 2021 |
| 2.9 mi | 2505 TURTLE CREEK BLVD | New construction of 20-story assisted living building wit... | Inspection Phase | Aug 06, 2024 |
No notes yet
West Love represents a potential refinance trigger within 12–24 months if the 2020 Capital One loan approaches maturity (term length not disclosed in data). The $44.6M debt equates to $121.2K per unit against a $74M appraised value ($200.9K/unit), yielding an LTV of approximately 60.3%, which is moderate but will stress meaningfully if rates remain elevated at refi. The single transaction since 2020 and absentee ownership structure suggest a buy-and-hold institutional holder rather than a distressed seller, though the gap between appraised value ($74M) and estimated sale price ($68.6M) signals 7.2% downward valuation pressure—likely rate-driven cap rate expansion. Without DSCR, monthly payment detail, or rate information, refinancing risk remains unquantified; obtain loan documents to confirm maturity date and workout scenarios.
No notes yet
West Love trades at a 3.5% cap rate versus 4.99% submarket average, pricing in stabilized Class A positioning despite 2016 vintage and modest $6.5K NOI per unit—roughly 10–15% below Dallas B/C comps. The $5.4M gap between appraised value ($74.0M) and estimated sale price ($68.6M) suggests either conservative appraisal assumptions or market softness, though at $186.5K per unit the asking price remains 10.4% below submarket comparables ($208.0K). A 50% opex ratio and 0.5% vacancy are tight; the disconnect between 3.5% cap rate and 3.25% implied rate indicates buyer assumptions of rent growth or further operational leverage.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $44,609,000 (Aug 2020, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
West Love is a 368-unit, four-story mid-rise completed in 2016 with brick exterior and wood-frame construction, offering 311.9K SF of net leasable area across excellent-condition units. The property trades on proximity to Dallas Love Field Airport with an amenity-heavy positioning (resort pool, CrossFit gym, multiple social spaces, dog wash) that signals upscale positioning despite a 56 walk score indicating car dependency. No parking type is specified in the data, and utilities burden allocation is unrecorded. The 4.2 Google rating and "Luxury Apartments Made with Love" positioning target lifestyle-conscious renters in a secondary airport-adjacent submarket.
No notes yet
Weak leasing momentum with aggressive concessions masking modest asking rents. Only 2 active listings across 368 units signal either recent vacancy fill or stalled marketing; the property is offering 4 weeks free (on select units, suggesting selective use rather than market-wide pressure). Current asking rents of $1.1K (studios) and $1.0K (1BR) trail submarket benchmarks by 31–45%, indicating the property is either Class B/C or significantly underperforming comparable stock. Recent lease events from June 2025 show in-place rents 40–55% higher than current ask ($1.4K–$1.6K for 1BR vs. $1.0K ask), pointing to either tenant turnover at lower renewal rates or a data lag in the scrape; the submarket grew 18.4% YoY, but this property is not capturing that upside in posted rents.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | 1 | 525 | $1,156 | Active | Jun 13 | 298 | |
|
Jun $1,156
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 537 | $1,031 | Active | Apr 3 | 369 | |
|
Apr $1,031
|
|||||||
| Apt 1110 | 2BR | 3 | 1,480 | $2,570 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| Apt 1346 | 2BR | 2 | 1,491 | $2,557 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| 2BR | 2 | 1,491 | $2,532 | Inactive | Sep 28 | 1 | |
|
Sep $2,532
→
Sep $2,532
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,217 | $2,367 | Inactive | Jun 24 | 1 | |
|
Jun $2,215
→
Jun $2,367
(↑6.9%)
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,357 | $2,294 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $2,294
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,140 | $2,095 | Inactive | Jun 13 | 1 | |
|
Jun $2,095
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,217 | $2,053 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $2,053
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,140 | $1,988 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,988
|
|||||||
| Apt 1114 | 2BR | 2 | 1,140 | $1,978 | Inactive | Sep 10 | 1 |
| 2BR | 2 | 1,140 | $1,965 | Inactive | Jun 15 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,953
→
Jun $1,965
(↑0.6%)
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,140 | $1,948 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,948
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,140 | $1,943 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,943
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,148 | $1,938 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,938
→
Oct $1,938
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,118 | $1,934 | Inactive | Jun 15 | 1 | |
|
May $1,915
→
Jun $1,934
→
Jun $1,934
→
Jun $1,934
(↑1.0%)
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,118 | $1,924 | Inactive | Jun 15 | 1 | |
|
May $1,905
→
May $1,905
→
May $1,924
→
Jun $1,924
(↑1.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,911 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,911
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,148 | $1,897 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,897
→
Oct $1,897
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2278 | 2BR | 2 | 1,048 | $1,857 | Inactive | Sep 10 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,855 | Inactive | Sep 28 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,855
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,038 | $1,837 | Inactive | Sep 25 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,837
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,038 | $1,828 | Inactive | May 12 | 1 | |
|
May $1,828
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,048 | $1,824 | Inactive | May 11 | 1 | |
|
May $1,824
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 883 | $1,807 | Inactive | Sep 25 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,807
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 883 | $1,797 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,797
→
Sep $1,797
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2174 | 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,762 | Inactive | Sep 11 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,761 | Inactive | Sep 28 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,761
→
Sep $1,761
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 1142 | 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,736 | Inactive | Sep 8 | 1 |
| Apt 1333 | 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,731 | Inactive | Sep 8 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,720 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,720
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,715 | Inactive | Sep 21 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,715
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,705 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,705
|
|||||||
| Apt 1223 | 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,705 | Inactive | Sep 19 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,698 | Inactive | May 31 | 1 | |
|
May $1,698
|
|||||||
| Apt 2489 | 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,681 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| Apt 1421 | 1BR | 1 | 826 | $1,681 | Inactive | Sep 11 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,680 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,680
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,676 | Inactive | Sep 28 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,676
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 621 | $1,659 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,659
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,658 | Inactive | Jun 9 | 1 | |
|
May $1,643
→
May $1,643
→
Jun $1,658
(↑0.9%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,654 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,654
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 826 | $1,651 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,651
→
Oct $1,651
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,651 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,651
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,649 | Inactive | Sep 25 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,649
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,642 | Inactive | Sep 22 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,642
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,640 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,640
→
Sep $1,640
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,640 | Inactive | Sep 21 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,640
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,638 | Inactive | May 12 | 1 | |
|
May $1,638
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 826 | $1,633 | Inactive | Jun 3 | 1 | |
|
May $1,633
→
Jun $1,633
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 840 | $1,613 | Inactive | Jun 15 | 1 | |
|
May $1,613
→
Jun $1,613
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,603 | Inactive | Jun 15 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,697
→
Jun $1,603
(↓5.5%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2450 | 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,582 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,580 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,580
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,572 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,572
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,562 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,562
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,559 | Inactive | Jun 2 | 1 | |
|
May $1,544
→
Jun $1,559
(↑1.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,549 | Inactive | Jun 13 | 1 | |
|
May $1,534
→
May $1,549
→
Jun $1,549
(↑1.0%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2351 | 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,545 | Inactive | Sep 15 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,534 | Inactive | Jun 16 | 1 | |
|
May $1,519
→
Jun $1,534
(↑1.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,530 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,530
→
Oct $1,530
(↑0.0%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 621 | $1,529 | Inactive | Jun 13 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,649
→
Jun $1,529
(↓7.3%)
|
|||||||
| Apt 2374 | 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,527 | Inactive | Sep 11 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 621 | $1,524 | Inactive | Sep 29 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,524
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 737 | $1,524 | Inactive | Sep 28 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,524
|
|||||||
| Apt 1105 | 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,522 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| Apt 1109 | 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,522 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,519 | Inactive | Jun 13 | 1 | |
|
Jun $1,519
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,519 | Inactive | May 26 | 1 | |
|
May $1,519
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,512 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,512
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,510 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,510
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,504 | Inactive | May 13 | 1 | |
|
May $1,504
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 621 | $1,499 | Inactive | Sep 28 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,499
|
|||||||
| Apt 1307 | 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,497 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| Apt 1213 | 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,492 | Inactive | Sep 11 | 1 |
| Apt 1424 | 1BR | 1 | 677 | $1,457 | Inactive | Sep 12 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 720 | $1,454 | Inactive | May 10 | 1 | |
|
May $1,454
|
|||||||
| Apt 1139 | 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,437 | Inactive | Sep 10 | 1 |
| 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,434 | Inactive | Jun 15 | 1 | |
|
May $1,419
→
May $1,434
→
Jun $1,434
→
Jun $1,434
(↑1.1%)
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 621 | $1,410 | Inactive | May 11 | 1 | |
|
May $1,410
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 683 | $1,364 | Inactive | May 23 | 1 | |
|
May $1,364
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 525 | $1,355 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,355
|
|||||||
| Studio | 1 | 525 | $1,343 | Inactive | May 26 | 1 | |
|
May $1,343
|
|||||||
| Apt 2380 | BR | 1 | 525 | $1,340 | Inactive | Sep 19 | 1 |
| BR | 1 | 525 | $1,335 | Inactive | Oct 1 | 1 | |
|
Oct $1,335
|
|||||||
| BR | 1 | 525 | $1,315 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,315
|
|||||||
| Studio | 1 | 525 | $1,304 | Inactive | May 21 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,515
→
Oct $1,515
→
May $1,304
(↓13.9%)
|
|||||||
| BR | 1 | 525 | $1,260 | Inactive | Sep 30 | 1 | |
|
Sep $1,260
|
|||||||
No notes yet
Affordability mismatch signals occupancy risk in immediate submarket. The 1-mile radius—where tenant conversion is highest—shows a 32.3% affordability ratio against $1.09K rent, well above the 28–30% threshold, despite 93.5% renter concentration and median household income of $58.8K. The 1-mile income distribution is bottom-heavy (44.9% earn under $50K), indicating workforce housing demand that the $1.1K rent may outpace. By contrast, the 3- and 5-mile rings support the rent more comfortably (19.5% and 19.3% ratios) with median incomes near $107K and 41.4–45.8% in the $100K+ brackets, suggesting West Love depends on draw from higher-income surrounding submarkets rather than local foot traffic. This geographic income cliff raises lease-up and renewal velocity risk if the property cannot retain its competitive positioning as a workforce asset in an increasingly affluent ring.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 2 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Unit Mix Analysis — West Love Apartments
The property exhibits severe concentration risk, with one-bedroom units comprising 16.6% of the 368-unit portfolio while studios and two-bedrooms collectively represent only 6.3%—an unusually thin tail for a 2016-vintage asset. The 343 unaccounted units and incomplete listing data prevent full market-rate assessment, but available comps show studios commanding $1.156M (12.1% rent premium over one-bedrooms at $1.031M), signaling either premium positioning or data anomalies. Without demographic context or comparable market unit splits, the skew toward one-bedrooms suggests either operational constraints, prior conversion activity, or a young-professional target that should be validated against Dallas submarket norms and occupancy patterns.
Estimated from 84 listed units (22.8% of 368 total)
No notes yet
No notes yet
West Love Apartments shows modest 3.1% annual appreciation to $74.0M, supported by a healthy 89.7% improvement-to-total-value ratio that reflects the asset's recent 2016 vintage and limits near-term redevelopment upside. At $201.1K per unit, the valuation appears reasonable for a stabilized Class A product but offers no distress signals or extraordinary value inflection. The $7.7M land value (10.3% of total) provides minimal land banking optionality absent significant density or use conversion.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $74,000,000 | +3.1% |
No notes yet
Star distribution reveals a bimodal, management-driven review pattern that masks operational friction. The 349 five-star reviews (74.1%) cluster almost entirely around leasing staff (Alexis, Blake, Madi, Ryssa) with identical praise templates, while 73 one-star reviews (15.5%) cite noise, security (broken gates, robbery), maintenance responsiveness, and property management competence—substantive operational issues, not sales experience. The 0.1-point decline from prior 6-month average (4.7 to 4.6) and the sharp disconnect between recent five-star tour reviews and older resident complaints suggest active reputation management masking unresolved asset quality problems. This review profile signals strong leasing execution but weak property operations and resident retention; prudent underwriting should heavily discount Google ratings and conduct third-party condition assessment and resident interviews.
472 reviews total
Lex was amazing on tour!
Owner response · Feb 2026
We greatly appreciate your interest in our welcoming community, Ahlura! We are so happy to see your satisfaction with Lex's thorough touring experience, and we will gladly share your glowing feedback with her. If you think of any additional questions about our apartment homes, please do not hesitate to reach out. Thank you!
Lex was terrific and very awesome and easy to work with!!!
Owner response · Feb 2026
Josue, it is wonderful to see your great experience with our dedicated team! We all work hard to show everyone an above-and-beyond experience, and we cannot wait to pass along these kind words to Lex. Feel free to call or stop by our office if you need any additional assistance.
Alexis was wonderful to work with. She was very helpful answering all our questions.
Owner response · Feb 2026
Bailey, it is always a pleasure to hear that a member of our team has made a great impression. Thank you for letting us know that you found Alexis helpful! We are sure that your appreciation will mean a lot.
Blake gave an excellent tour of the property. It was a nice space! Definitely worth a visit if you’re looking for a good community.
Owner response · Feb 2026
Hi Jay, thank you for giving Blake's service and our community five stars! It is wonderful knowing that you love all that we have to offer.
Alexis was amazing very helpful and explained everything well loved my tour will be staying here soon !
Owner response · Feb 2026
Tedreanna, we are proud to have professionals like Alexis on our team, and your feedback is validating. We will let her know you enjoyed your tour with her. Thank you for your time, and we hope to welcome you home soon.
No notes yet
No notes yet