4800 KELLER SPRINGS RD, ADDISON, TX, 750016053
$75,044,080
2025 Appraised Value
↓ 30.4% from prior year
🏘️ Community includes 2 DCAD parcels (643 total units)
Watch-list candidate with material refinancing urgency and operational headwinds offsetting valuation dislocation. The property trades at $212.5K/unit—16.0% below Class A submarket comps—reflecting a 192 bps cap rate premium (6.14% vs. 5.92% market), but this discount masks acute refinancing risk: the $36.1M loan is six years past a May 2024 maturity, while the $75.0M appraisal sits $23.4M above estimated sale value, constraining recapitalization capacity. Rental performance is deteriorating asymmetrically—1BR units underperforming benchmarks by 11.2% with active concessions, while 2BR holds—pointing to occupancy or rent compression in a tightening submarket (0.28% new supply pipeline). Demographics support Class A positioning ($84.8K 1-mile median income, 81.1% renter concentration), yet Walk Score 67 and suburban positioning conflict with $1.58K rental aspiration, suggesting operational underperformance is structural rather than cyclical. The 8.9-year hold absent documented exit strategy, combined with overdue debt and negative appraisal trajectory (30.4% YoY decline), indicates distressed refi motivation; pursue as opportunistic debt or restructured equity entry, but validate unit-mix data integrity and clarify appraisal velocity before committing capital.
No notes yet
Hot Rates: Limited Time – Don't Miss Out! Take Advantage of Reduced Pricing While It Lasts.
At Addison Keller in Addison, we believe your home should reflect your hard work and your lifestyle, without unnecessary cost. Our Essential Living Program offers thoughtfully priced, high-quality apartment homes for Addison's essential professionals, including healthcare workers, educators, first responders, military personnel, and others who keep our city thriving.
Interior Finishes & Renovation Status
Addison Keller Springs exhibits a partial renovation profile with units upgraded to 2016–2020 standards featuring modern dark espresso cabinetry, granite countertops, stainless steel appliances, and vinyl plank flooring, but the sample size (1 kitchen photo of 353 units) limits visibility into portfolio-wide consistency. The 2020-era kitchen shows contemporary finishes—waterfall island edge, subway tile backsplash, pendant lighting—positioning upgraded units at solid Class B quality. Without data on unimproved units, value-add potential through standardized kitchen/bath renovations across the remaining inventory remains unclear.
Amenity Quality & Exterior Condition
The property punches above its 2012 vintage with resort-caliber amenities: an inground pool with integrated hot tub island, mature landscaping, and a premium clubhouse featuring designer furnishings and high-end finishes. White/cream facades with modern black railings and well-maintained stone decking signal strong curb appeal and capital reinvestment post-construction.
Class Assessment
This is solidly Class B, potentially Class B+ given recent amenity and selective unit upgrades, though full renovation penetration rates are needed to justify B+ positioning.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Location Profile Underperforms Rent Positioning
Walk Score of 67 indicates car-dependent suburban positioning, yet $1.58K monthly rents suggest aspirational urban-adjacent pricing. Absent transit data limits assessment, but the combination of moderate walkability (67) and weak bikeability (58) implies limited non-auto mobility—a liability for younger, transit-preferring demographics that typically command above-market rents. Addison's office/employment concentration may justify the rent level if proximity to those nodes is strong, but the walkability scores suggest the property trades on location cachet rather than functional urban amenities density. Recommend stress-testing lease velocity and tenant profile against comparable Class B suburban assets with stronger walk/transit fundamentals.
No notes yet
The 1-unit pipeline represents negligible supply pressure at 0.28% of the 353-unit asset, posing no material risk to occupancy or rent trajectory. However, the single nearby project in inspection phase warrants monitoring given the submarket's deteriorating vacancy trend—any meaningful delivery could exacerbate downward rent pressure in an already softening market. The Frankford Rd permit lacks cost and unit count details, limiting competitive positioning assessment, but the modest scale of disclosed pipeline suggests broader submarket constraints rather than concentrated new supply competition at this location.
| Distance | Address | Description | Status | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 mi | 8230 FRANKFORD RD | NEW CONSTRUCTION MFD. 125 UNITS SENIOR LIVING. | Inspection Phase | Feb 24, 2025 |
No notes yet
Refinancing risk is acute: The $36.1M loan originated May 2017 with an 84-month term matures May 2024—six years past maturity as of this analysis—creating immediate extension or refinance pressure. At $102.4K per unit, the debt load is moderate, but the gap between appraised value ($75.0M) and estimated sale price ($51.6M) signals 31.2% downward revaluation risk that will compress refinance capacity. Eight transactions over 17 years, including two tax deeds (2008–2009) during the GFC, suggest opportunistic operator rather than distressed holder, but the current owner's 8.9-year hold without demonstrated exit strategy combined with matured debt indicates potential motivation to transact at compressed valuations.
No notes yet
Addison Keller Springs is priced as a significant value-add opportunity, trading at a 192 bps cap rate premium to market while carrying $27.4M of unrealized upside to appraised value. At $146.3K/unit versus $174.2K submarket comp pricing, the property is valued 16.0% below peer Class A multifamily, reflecting the 6.14% estimated cap rate versus 5.92% market. The 50.0% opex ratio is healthy for the vintage and class, but the $9.0K NOI per unit lags market productivity, suggesting either occupancy drag (5.1% vacancy is reasonable) or rental rate compression that the $146.3K price point is discounting. The 192 bps spread between estimated (6.14%) and implied cap rates (4.22%) signals conservative underwriting or embedded value-add operational improvements required to justify the $75.0M appraisal.
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $36,140,000 (May 2017, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Addison Keller Springs is a 353-unit, mid-rise apartment community built in 2012 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior across 329,946 SF in four stories. The property is in excellent condition with good quality finishes, offering controlled-access garage parking with EV charging and resident/visitor spaces. Located in Addison near DART access (Walk Score 67), the community allows up to two pets per unit at $400 fee plus $25/month rent with breed restrictions and vaccination requirements. Utilities are resident-paid with no utilities included in rent.
No notes yet
Addison Keller Springs shows flat rents with widening concessions targeting 1BR weakness. Average rent holds at $1.58K, but 1BR units lag the $1.53K market benchmark by 11.2% while 2BR units track the $2.01K benchmark precisely—indicating pricing pressure on smaller units. Active concessions ("Hot Rates") with unspecified terms, combined with 18 active listings (5.1% of stock), suggest the property is competing aggressively on 1BR leasing; recent 1BR signings cluster around $1.25K–$1.50K despite asking averages of $1.36K. The 2BR leasing activity ($1.75K–$2.11K range) shows tighter spread and stronger pricing, implying different leasing trajectories across unit mix.
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BR | 2 | 1,243 | $2,106 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $2,106
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,155 | $2,083 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $2,083
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,155 | $2,063 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $2,063
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,093 | $2,029 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $2,005
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,063 | $2,025 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $2,025
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 1,063 | $1,745 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,745
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 862 | $1,631 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,445
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 789 | $1,482 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,482
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 857 | $1,415 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,415
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 764 | $1,395 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,395
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 789 | $1,383 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,470
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 857 | $1,383 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,383
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 789 | $1,351 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,351
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 764 | $1,273 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,495
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 789 | $1,268 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,268
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 764 | $1,248 | Active | Jun 11 | 665 | |
|
Jun $1,248
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 764 | $1,245 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,245
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 764 | $1,245 | Active | Mar 24 | — | |
|
Mar $1,245
|
|||||||
No notes yet
Affordability Risk in Core Submarket; Asset Positioned for Affluent Renters
The 1-mile radius affordability ratio of 24.7% is elevated relative to the 3-mile (21.8%) and 5-mile (20.7%) periphery, signaling tight rent-to-income alignment in the immediate trade area where 81.1% of households rent. The $1,576 average rent requires ~$76K annual household income to remain below 25% of gross—achievable for the 59.3% of 1-mile households earning $75K+, but the 20.1% earning under $50K creates potential lease-up friction. The income distribution skews heavily toward the $100K–$150K+ cohorts (42.2% in the 1-mile radius), confirming this is a Class A/affluent renter product rather than workforce housing; the compressed 1-mile renter base ($84.8K median) versus broader 5-mile MSA income ($94K) underscores the property's reliance on a concentrated, higher-income demographic within walking distance. Population density and renter concentration at 81.1% provide demand stability, though the significant drop to 66.8% at 3 miles and 56.8% at 5 miles suggests limited spillover absorption if core positioning softens.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 3 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
Data integrity issue prevents meaningful analysis. The unitmix object shows only 1 total unit across all bedroom types, yet listingsby_bedroom reports 18 units (12 one-BR, 6 two-BR) and the property claims 353 total units. The 94.9% discrepancy makes it impossible to assess actual portfolio concentration, rent progression, or demographic alignment. Recommend validating source data before proceeding with underwriting—current figures suggest either a metadata error or incomplete data pull.
Estimated from 1 listed units (0.3% of 353 total)
No notes yet
A maximum of two (2) pets are allowed per apartment. $400 pet fee per pet, $25 pet rent per pet. We do not have a weight limit, but we do have the following pet breeds and pet type restrictions: Pit Bull Terriers, Chows, Doberman Pinschers, Rottweilers, Huskies, and any other breed generally deemed aggressive. A pet interview will be required. Aquarium pets are allowed with the exception of exotic animals, including, but not limited to rodents, rabbits, and ferrets. Pets must have proof of current vaccinations, proof of weight when fully grown, and breed documentation. No Smoking.
No notes yet
Appraisal Analysis: Addison Keller Springs
The 2025 appraisal at $75.0M represents a sharp 30.4% year-over-year decline, signaling either significant market repricing or distress conditions in Dallas multifamily—likely a combination of rate-induced valuation compression and potential operational underperformance. At $212.5K per unit, the property trades well below recent Dallas new construction comps (~$250K+), suggesting either below-market rents, occupancy issues, or both. The 5.1% land-to-value ratio ($3.8M on $75.0M) is materially compressed relative to the improvement value split, leaving minimal redevelopment optionality; this is a stabilized hold-to-maturity play rather than a value-add or land play. Without prior-year appraisals, the velocity of this decline cannot be contextualized—clarify whether this is a single-year shock or a multi-year deterioration before deciding on hold/sell/restructure positioning.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $75,044,080 | -30.4% |
No notes yet
No notes yet
No notes yet