TUSCANY AT GOLDMARK - (75% TC) TXA19990205

13731 GOLDMARK DR, DALLAS, TX, 752404251

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Mid-Rise 184 units Built 1998 4 stories ★ 4.0 (76 reviews) 🚶 63 Somewhat Walkable 🚌 40 Some Transit 🚲 64 Bikeable

$14,283,800

2025 Appraised Value

↑ 9.9% from prior year

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TUSCANY AT GOLDMARK

The imminent September 2025 debt maturity combined with a $4.8M gap between appraised value ($14.3M) and estimated sale price ($9.5M) signals a motivated seller facing material refinancing risk in a higher-rate environment—this is a forced-move scenario rather than opportunistic positioning. Operationally, the asset is deteriorating sharply: Google reviews show a cliff from 3.9-star historical average to 1.0-star recent ratings tied to management failure (including a 3-week elevator outage in a seniors community), which depresses lease renewals and creates immediate leakage from the 75% occupancy baseline. Demographically, the 1-mile micromarket is workforce-constrained ($63.5K median income, 27.5% affordability stretch), but the asset benefits from adjacent affluent suburbs ($89.8K median at 5-mile) and zero pipeline competition, enabling rent recovery post-repositioning. The property itself offers textbook value-add: well-maintained exteriors and strong amenities with fragmented interior finishes ripe for systematic modernization across the 184-unit portfolio. Recommendation: Strong acquisition candidate if purchase price reflects the $9.5M market signal (60–66% LTV range) and management replacement is executable within 90 days; the maturity cliff and operational breakdown create both urgency and pricing leverage, but verify the $4.8M valuation gap before proceeding.

AI overview · Updated 7 days ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

Welcome Home to Tuscany at Goldmark

Welcome Home to Tuscany at Goldmark! Our age 62 and above senior apartment community offers 1 and 2-bedroom floor options and a variety of convenient amenities and features. Located in North East Dallas, TX, you are close to shopping, dining, and entertainment.

Class B property with deferred interior modernization despite well-maintained exteriors. Tuscany at Goldmark presents a mixed picture: the 1998 garden-style complex shows good exterior condition with warm stucco finishes, mature landscaping, and amenities (resort-style pool, courtyard) that punch above typical mid-rise Class B standards. However, interior finishes reveal fragmentation—builder-grade and upgraded units coexist, with estimated renovations clustered around the 2000s and only standard stainless steel appliances documented across 12 photos. The fair-condition paint and basic dome lighting suggest inconsistent unit-level upkeep. Value-add opportunity exists in systematic kitchen/bath modernization and standardized finishes across the 184-unit portfolio, particularly given the strong amenity foundation and 75% trailing twelve-month occupancy baseline.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

/

AI Analysis

Goldmark's 63 walk score signals car-dependent suburban positioning rather than urban-core demand drivers—tenants here prioritize parking and personal vehicle access over pedestrian convenience. The 40 transit score effectively eliminates transit-dependent renters, while the 64 bike score overstates utility in a Dallas suburban context where cycling infrastructure remains sparse. Without rent data, we cannot assess whether the location premium justifies the walkability discount relative to comparable inner-loop assets; similar suburban density typically commands $1.2–1.5K range, suggesting this property either competes on unit quality/amenities or targets cost-conscious renters willing to trade location for value. Verify proximity to employment anchors (DFW, Plano tech corridor, or major retail clusters) to validate the risk-reward against premium walkable alternatives.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
Distance Name Category
📍 11.1 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

Pipeline Analysis:

The property faces zero near-term supply pressure: 0.0% pipeline penetration with no active construction in the immediate competitive set. This insulation from new deliveries, combined with an improving vacancy trend in the submarket, positions the asset favorably for rent growth without meaningful lease-up competition over the typical 18–24 month delivery window. Verify pipeline data currency, as Dallas markets often experience rapid permitting activity that may not be reflected in trailing datasets.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
🏗️ 0 permits within 3 mi
0% pipeline

No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles

Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt & Transaction History

Key takeaway: Significant refinancing risk ahead. The $6.65M loan originated in 2015 with a 240-month term matures in September 2025—approximately 11 months from now—at a property where the current appraised value ($14.3M) vastly exceeds the estimated sale price ($9.5M), suggesting material value deterioration or market-driven pricing pressure. Loan-to-value sits at 70% against appraised value but 70% against the lower sale estimate, placing the borrower in a tight spot if refinancing rates exceed the original loan's implicit rate. The single transaction in 10+ years and non-absentee ownership structure indicate a long-term hold, but the maturity cliff combined with compressed valuation likely makes this seller motivated to move before rate lock-in becomes untenable.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
Ownership Duration
10.6 years
Since Sep 2015
Transactions
1 recorded
Owner Type
Company
Owner Mailing Address
PO BOX A3951, CHICAGO, IL 60690-3951
Current Lender
Miscellaneous Ins Co
Loan Amount
$6,650,000 ($36,141/unit)
Maturity Date
Not recorded
Loan Type
Unknown
September 04, 2015 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: M N Midpark Ltd, via Stewart Title
Miscellaneous Ins Co $6,650,000 Senior Term: 20yr
Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
$9,500,000
Sale $/Unit
$51,630
Value YoY
+9.9%
Implied Cap Rate
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
Est. Vacancy
Submarket Vac.
3.9%
Eff. Gross Income
OpEx Ratio
50%
Est. NOI
NOI/Unit

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
$1,941/yr
Est. DSCR

Based on most recent loan: $6,650,000 (Sep 2015, attom)

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
5.28%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$153,271
Property: $51,630 (↓66%)
Rent/SF
$1.62/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

Tuscany at Goldmark is a 184-unit, four-story mid-rise built in 1998 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior, offering 1- and 2-bedroom units across 157K SF in Northeast Dallas. The property is positioned as age 62+ senior housing in good condition with surface parking and mid-market amenities (pool, fitness center, shuttle services). Water, trash, wastewater, and pest control are included in rent, with the community pet-friendly and accepting housing vouchers. Walk score of 63 reflects moderate transit access near shopping and dining but with limited urban density.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

Property Details

Account #
007760000008A0000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Mid-Rise
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
GOOD
Condition
GOOD
Stories
4
Gross Building Area
157,048 SF
Net Leasable Area
157,048 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
November 14, 1997
Place ID
ChIJq8e19isgTIYRgjMGofVEOs8
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
M N MIDPARK LTD
Mailing Address
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 606903951
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

Submarket Rent Growth
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Improving
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$1.62/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Rent Trends

Estimated Occupancy

Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units

Asking Rent Range

Min/avg/max asking rents from property website

Available Units Over Time

Latest Scrape (Mar 22, 2026)

Rent Range
$1,010 – $1,487
Avg: $1,230
Available
6 units

Fees

Application: Admin: Pet Deposit: Pet Rent Monthly:
🏠 0 active listings | Trend: No data
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
2BR 2 952 $1,487 Inactive Mar 22
Mar $1,487
2BR 2 952 $1,319 Inactive Mar 22
Mar $1,319
1BR 1 650 $1,236 Inactive Mar 22
Mar $1,236
2BR 2 952 $1,216 Inactive Mar 22
Mar $1,216
1BR 1 650 $1,110 Inactive Mar 22
Mar $1,110
1BR 1 650 $1,010 Inactive Mar 22
Mar $1,010
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

The 1-mile micromarket is a workforce-renter enclave with structural affordability constraints: median household income of $63.5K supports only a 27.5% affordability ratio, meaning rents are stretched for the local resident base. However, 73.2% renter concentration signals deep demand from renters priced out of homeownership ($250.4K median home value), providing occupancy resilience. The 3-mile and 5-mile rings reveal significantly stronger fundamentals—median incomes jump to $85.4K and $89.8K with affordability ratios of 21.5% and 20.4%—suggesting the property benefits from adjacent affluent suburban submarkets (22%+ earning $150K+) even if the immediate neighborhood is lower-income. The income distribution skew in the 1-mile radius (43% under $50K) versus 5-mile radius (33% under $50K) indicates the property is positioned to capture workforce renters who prefer this location; success hinges on whether rents are anchored to the $63.5K micro-market or the $89.8K broader market.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
29,755
Households
11,058
Avg Household Size
2.77
Median HH Income
$63,529
Median Home Value
$250,399
Median Rent
$1,458
% Renter Occupied
73.2%
Affordability
27.5% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
145,461
Households
57,586
Avg Household Size
2.57
Median HH Income
$85,427
Median Home Value
$376,402
Median Rent
$1,528
% Renter Occupied
55.9%
Affordability
21.5% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
406,863
Households
172,097
Avg Household Size
2.45
Median HH Income
$89,788
Median Home Value
$369,947
Median Rent
$1,528
% Renter Occupied
59.8%
Affordability
20.4% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 6 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities

Pet Policy

Pet Friendly Community

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

Appraisal Interpretation: Tuscany at Goldmark

The 2025 appraisal at $14.3M reflects 9.9% year-over-year appreciation, translating to $77.6K per unit—solid but not exceptional for a 1998-vintage class B asset in the Dallas market. Land represents only 10.5% of total value ($1.5M), constraining redevelopment optionality; any value-add thesis must center on NOI improvement rather than tear-down potential. The single appraisal snapshot prevents trend analysis, but the recent 9.9% lift suggests current market pricing rather than distress conditions.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $14,283,800 +9.9%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Rating trajectory signals deteriorating operations and management quality. The 6-month average of 1.0 versus 3-year distribution (39 five-stars, 10 one-stars) reveals a sharp operational cliff: recent reviews cluster on elevator failures, management hostility, and deferred maintenance, while historical five-star reviews (2022–early 2024) praise amenities and prior staff. The pattern suggests management transition or turnover triggered resident dissatisfaction—multiple 2024 reviews reference "new management" negatively after a brief February 2024 honeymoon period. Critical failure is a 3-week elevator outage in a 184-unit senior community, a liability and lease-renewal risk. This property shows acute operational degradation inconsistent with PE acquisition thesis unless tied to value-add management replacement.

AI analysis · Updated 7 days ago

Rating Distribution

5★
39 (56%)
4★
13 (19%)
3★
7 (10%)
2★
1 (1%)
1★
10 (14%)

70 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Ashley Webb ★☆☆☆☆ Local Guide Dec 2025

They have a broken elevator that has been broken for nearly three weeks trapping tenants on their floor. This an elderly community and not everyone can use the stairs. Shame on the management company, Allied Orion Group, for not fixing this problem immediately.

ameen lou ★☆☆☆☆ Oct 2025

Super rude management, no helpful at all, helen the manager she yells at you with zero respect.

Ponisie Marudas ★☆☆☆☆ Aug 2025

Not very nice management. The leasing manager was extremely nice but the assistant manager was very rude and not even willing to give me any advice or give any notes to the person that I was trying to reach out to. And they keep your deposit money , all been missed information. Over all the management was terrible.

Celest ★★☆☆☆ Local Guide Jul 2025

This place needs a lot of work.... inside and out.

jaz will ★★★★★ Local Guide Apr 2025

Nice neighborhood my kids granny lives here, it's so peaceful definitely a place to not be bothered..

Showing 5 of 70 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet