13731 GOLDMARK DR, DALLAS, TX, 752404251
$14,283,800
2025 Appraised Value
↑ 9.9% from prior year
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: TUSCANY AT GOLDMARK
The imminent September 2025 debt maturity combined with a $4.8M gap between appraised value ($14.3M) and estimated sale price ($9.5M) signals a motivated seller facing material refinancing risk in a higher-rate environment—this is a forced-move scenario rather than opportunistic positioning. Operationally, the asset is deteriorating sharply: Google reviews show a cliff from 3.9-star historical average to 1.0-star recent ratings tied to management failure (including a 3-week elevator outage in a seniors community), which depresses lease renewals and creates immediate leakage from the 75% occupancy baseline. Demographically, the 1-mile micromarket is workforce-constrained ($63.5K median income, 27.5% affordability stretch), but the asset benefits from adjacent affluent suburbs ($89.8K median at 5-mile) and zero pipeline competition, enabling rent recovery post-repositioning. The property itself offers textbook value-add: well-maintained exteriors and strong amenities with fragmented interior finishes ripe for systematic modernization across the 184-unit portfolio. Recommendation: Strong acquisition candidate if purchase price reflects the $9.5M market signal (60–66% LTV range) and management replacement is executable within 90 days; the maturity cliff and operational breakdown create both urgency and pricing leverage, but verify the $4.8M valuation gap before proceeding.
No notes yet
Welcome Home to Tuscany at Goldmark
Welcome Home to Tuscany at Goldmark! Our age 62 and above senior apartment community offers 1 and 2-bedroom floor options and a variety of convenient amenities and features. Located in North East Dallas, TX, you are close to shopping, dining, and entertainment.
Class B property with deferred interior modernization despite well-maintained exteriors. Tuscany at Goldmark presents a mixed picture: the 1998 garden-style complex shows good exterior condition with warm stucco finishes, mature landscaping, and amenities (resort-style pool, courtyard) that punch above typical mid-rise Class B standards. However, interior finishes reveal fragmentation—builder-grade and upgraded units coexist, with estimated renovations clustered around the 2000s and only standard stainless steel appliances documented across 12 photos. The fair-condition paint and basic dome lighting suggest inconsistent unit-level upkeep. Value-add opportunity exists in systematic kitchen/bath modernization and standardized finishes across the 184-unit portfolio, particularly given the strong amenity foundation and 75% trailing twelve-month occupancy baseline.
/ ·
This photo was not identified as property-related.
No AI analysis available for this photo.
No notes yet
Goldmark's 63 walk score signals car-dependent suburban positioning rather than urban-core demand drivers—tenants here prioritize parking and personal vehicle access over pedestrian convenience. The 40 transit score effectively eliminates transit-dependent renters, while the 64 bike score overstates utility in a Dallas suburban context where cycling infrastructure remains sparse. Without rent data, we cannot assess whether the location premium justifies the walkability discount relative to comparable inner-loop assets; similar suburban density typically commands $1.2–1.5K range, suggesting this property either competes on unit quality/amenities or targets cost-conscious renters willing to trade location for value. Verify proximity to employment anchors (DFW, Plano tech corridor, or major retail clusters) to validate the risk-reward against premium walkable alternatives.
No notes yet
Pipeline Analysis:
The property faces zero near-term supply pressure: 0.0% pipeline penetration with no active construction in the immediate competitive set. This insulation from new deliveries, combined with an improving vacancy trend in the submarket, positions the asset favorably for rent growth without meaningful lease-up competition over the typical 18–24 month delivery window. Verify pipeline data currency, as Dallas markets often experience rapid permitting activity that may not be reflected in trailing datasets.
No multifamily construction permits found within 3 miles
No notes yet
Key takeaway: Significant refinancing risk ahead. The $6.65M loan originated in 2015 with a 240-month term matures in September 2025—approximately 11 months from now—at a property where the current appraised value ($14.3M) vastly exceeds the estimated sale price ($9.5M), suggesting material value deterioration or market-driven pricing pressure. Loan-to-value sits at 70% against appraised value but 70% against the lower sale estimate, placing the borrower in a tight spot if refinancing rates exceed the original loan's implicit rate. The single transaction in 10+ years and non-absentee ownership structure indicate a long-term hold, but the maturity cliff combined with compressed valuation likely makes this seller motivated to move before rate lock-in becomes untenable.
No notes yet
Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.
Based on most recent loan: $6,650,000 (Sep 2015, attom)
Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage
No notes yet
Tuscany at Goldmark is a 184-unit, four-story mid-rise built in 1998 with wood-frame construction and brick exterior, offering 1- and 2-bedroom units across 157K SF in Northeast Dallas. The property is positioned as age 62+ senior housing in good condition with surface parking and mid-market amenities (pool, fitness center, shuttle services). Water, trash, wastewater, and pest control are included in rent, with the community pet-friendly and accepting housing vouchers. Walk score of 63 reflects moderate transit access near shopping and dining but with limited urban density.
No notes yet
Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units
Min/avg/max asking rents from property website
| Unit | Beds | Baths | Sqft | Rent | Status | Listed | Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BR | 2 | 952 | $1,487 | Inactive | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,487
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 952 | $1,319 | Inactive | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,319
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 650 | $1,236 | Inactive | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,236
|
|||||||
| 2BR | 2 | 952 | $1,216 | Inactive | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,216
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 650 | $1,110 | Inactive | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,110
|
|||||||
| 1BR | 1 | 650 | $1,010 | Inactive | Mar 22 | — | |
|
Mar $1,010
|
|||||||
No notes yet
The 1-mile micromarket is a workforce-renter enclave with structural affordability constraints: median household income of $63.5K supports only a 27.5% affordability ratio, meaning rents are stretched for the local resident base. However, 73.2% renter concentration signals deep demand from renters priced out of homeownership ($250.4K median home value), providing occupancy resilience. The 3-mile and 5-mile rings reveal significantly stronger fundamentals—median incomes jump to $85.4K and $89.8K with affordability ratios of 21.5% and 20.4%—suggesting the property benefits from adjacent affluent suburban submarkets (22%+ earning $150K+) even if the immediate neighborhood is lower-income. The income distribution skew in the 1-mile radius (43% under $50K) versus 5-mile radius (33% under $50K) indicates the property is positioned to capture workforce renters who prefer this location; success hinges on whether rents are anchored to the $63.5K micro-market or the $89.8K broader market.
Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 6 tracts (1mi)
No notes yet
No notes yet
Pet Friendly Community
No notes yet
Appraisal Interpretation: Tuscany at Goldmark
The 2025 appraisal at $14.3M reflects 9.9% year-over-year appreciation, translating to $77.6K per unit—solid but not exceptional for a 1998-vintage class B asset in the Dallas market. Land represents only 10.5% of total value ($1.5M), constraining redevelopment optionality; any value-add thesis must center on NOI improvement rather than tear-down potential. The single appraisal snapshot prevents trend analysis, but the recent 9.9% lift suggests current market pricing rather than distress conditions.
| Year | Total Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $14,283,800 | +9.9% |
No notes yet
Rating trajectory signals deteriorating operations and management quality. The 6-month average of 1.0 versus 3-year distribution (39 five-stars, 10 one-stars) reveals a sharp operational cliff: recent reviews cluster on elevator failures, management hostility, and deferred maintenance, while historical five-star reviews (2022–early 2024) praise amenities and prior staff. The pattern suggests management transition or turnover triggered resident dissatisfaction—multiple 2024 reviews reference "new management" negatively after a brief February 2024 honeymoon period. Critical failure is a 3-week elevator outage in a 184-unit senior community, a liability and lease-renewal risk. This property shows acute operational degradation inconsistent with PE acquisition thesis unless tied to value-add management replacement.
70 reviews total
They have a broken elevator that has been broken for nearly three weeks trapping tenants on their floor. This an elderly community and not everyone can use the stairs. Shame on the management company, Allied Orion Group, for not fixing this problem immediately.
Super rude management, no helpful at all, helen the manager she yells at you with zero respect.
Not very nice management. The leasing manager was extremely nice but the assistant manager was very rude and not even willing to give me any advice or give any notes to the person that I was trying to reach out to. And they keep your deposit money , all been missed information. Over all the management was terrible.
This place needs a lot of work.... inside and out.
Nice neighborhood my kids granny lives here, it's so peaceful definitely a place to not be bothered..
No notes yet
No notes yet