DWELL AT MIDTOWN PARK

8169 MIDTOWN BLVD, DALLAS, TX, 752314473

APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR) Garden 395 units Built 2015 3 stories ★ 4.1 (431 reviews) 🚶 41 Car-Dependent 🚌 39 Some Transit 🚲 40 Somewhat Bikeable

$84,975,000

2025 Appraised Value

↓ 8.4% from prior year

DWELL AT MIDTOWN PARK — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PASS. The property presents a deteriorating operational and market positioning that contradicts its 2015-vintage Class A positioning. Appraisal decline of 8.4% YoY to $84.975M ($215.1K/unit)—below institutional hold standards—coupled with a maturing $47.6M loan (55.9% LTV on appraised value, 70.0% at estimated sale price) signals material refinancing risk at current rates; NOI sustainability is unverified and likely insufficient to service 4.5%+ debt. Tenant demand is concentrated in a narrow 1-mile affluent urban core ($110.0K median income, 25.0% earning $150K+) with weak suburban depth, creating cyclical vulnerability, while Google reviews reveal systematic operational distress (security failures, pest control, management responsiveness) masked by aggregate ratings—80 one-star reviews on access/habitability are revenue drains. The property's car-dependent positioning (Walk Score 41, Transit Score 39) misaligns with premium "Midtown" positioning, and a 25.6% unit mix blind spot combined with a studio/one-bedroom skew limits repositioning optionality. Capital refresh is partial (49.0% excellent, 26.3% fair/poor condition), exterior soiling is visible, and the near-zero pipeline provides no growth offset to submarket demand softness. Acquisition thesis is weak absent significant price correction below $200K/unit and detailed NOI/expense audit to validate operational recovery path.

AI overview · Updated about 20 hours ago
Abstract Notes

No notes yet

DWELL AT MIDTOWN PARK — Physical Condition Assessment

This 2015-built, 395-unit Class B+ property shows strong capital positioning with 49.0% of units in excellent condition and consistent modern finishes across the portfolio. Kitchen renovations cluster in the 2018–2022 window (37.5% of observations), featuring predominantly modern slab cabinetry, quartz countertops, and mid-range stainless steel appliances (Samsung/LG tier), with 85.0% of analyzed kitchens rated upgraded or better. However, 26.3% of units exhibit fair or poor condition with scuffed paint and deferred finish maintenance, indicating a partial rather than comprehensive capital refresh—units remain split between recently renovated and original 2015 builder-grade stock. Amenity quality aligns with the class (resort-style pool, contemporary landscaping, recessed lighting upgrades), but exterior fiber cement siding shows visible soiling and surface marks, suggesting moderate curb appeal risk if not addressed soon.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

/

AI Analysis

Location Profile Misaligned with Walkability Constraints

Dwell at Midtown Park's Walk Score of 41 and Transit Score of 39 classify it as a car-dependent submarket with limited multimodal commute options—a meaningful friction point for urban-oriented renters willing to pay for "Midtown" positioning. The Bike Score of 40 similarly indicates minimal last-mile utility. Without average monthly rent data, we cannot assess whether pricing reflects this accessibility discount relative to truly walkable Dallas corridors (Downtown, Bishop Arts, Lower Greenville), but the property's name and likely positioning suggest premium aspirations that the transportation fundamentals don't support. Verify tenant profile (age, income, auto ownership rates) against comparable car-dependent assets in the 300–400-unit range to validate demand assumptions.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
Distance Name Category
📍 8.1 miles from Downtown Dallas
Map Notes

No notes yet

The 1-unit pipeline (0.25% of existing inventory) poses negligible supply risk to Dwell at Midtown Park, but the deteriorating submarket vacancy trend suggests demand softness that could pressure occupancy and rents regardless of new competition. The two nearby permits—one in early plan review and one in prolonged permit limbo since late 2023—indicate potential future supply, though neither has broken ground and the low unit count near this 395-unit asset suggests they are either smaller projects or in different pockets of the submarket. Monitor permit progression; if these projects gain momentum in a weakening market, absorption becomes the real concern.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
🏗️ 1 permit within 3 mi
0% pipeline
Distance Address Description Status Filed
1.6 mi 8010 PARK LN Construction of a 20 story multifamily building with stru... In Review Nov 21, 2023
Nearby Construction Notes

No notes yet

Debt & Transaction History

The 8.4-year hold with a single transaction and absentee individual ownership suggests a buy-and-hold strategy rather than opportunistic repositioning, reducing near-term sale pressure. However, the $47.6M loan originated in November 2017 is likely maturing or already matured, creating substantial refinancing risk—at current rates, this debt would require materially higher debt service on a $68M estimated sale price ($120.5K per unit). The $47.6M loan-to-appraised-value ratio of 55.9% appears conservative on paper, but actual LTV at estimated sale price rises to 70.0%, signaling either current market softness or appraisal inflation. Without DSCR, rate, or current payment data, refinancing feasibility on this 2015-vintage asset depends critically on whether trailing NOI can support 4.5%+ interest rates.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
Ownership Duration
8.4 years
Since Nov 2017
Transactions
1 recorded
Owner Type
Individual
Absentee owner
Owner Mailing Address
1500 MARILLA ST # 6CN, DALLAS, TX 75201-6318

🏛️ TX Comptroller Entity Data

Beneficial Owner
City Of Dallas Housing Fin high
via officer match
Registered Agent
City Of Dallas Housing Finance Corporation
1500 MARILLA ST, ROOM 6CN, DALLAS, TX, 75201
Officers / Directors
City Of Dallas Housing Fin — GENERAL MA
Entity Mailing Address
1500 MARILLA ST RM 6CN, DALLAS, TX, 75201
State of Formation
TX
SOS Status
ACTIVE
Current Lender
Walker & Dunlop
Loan Amount
$47,600,000 ($120,506/unit)
Maturity Date
Not recorded
Loan Type
Unknown
November 07, 2017 Stand Alone Finance Deed of Trust
Buyer: Breit Mf Midtown Apartments Lp,
Walker & Dunlop $47,600,000 Senior
Debt Notes

No notes yet

Financial Estimates

Estimated from loan records, rental listings, and appraisal data using industry-standard assumptions.

Sale & Valuation

Est. Sale Price
$68,000,000
Sale $/Unit
$172,151
Value YoY
-8.4%
Implied Cap Rate
Est. Cap Rate

Operating Income

Gross Potential Rent
Est. Vacancy
Submarket Vac.
4.5%
Eff. Gross Income
OpEx Ratio
45%
Est. NOI
NOI/Unit

Debt & Taxes

Taxes/Unit
Est. DSCR

Based on most recent loan: $47,600,000 (Nov 2017, attom)

Submarket Benchmarks

📊

Computed from nearby properties within 3 miles of similar vintage

Submarket Cap Rate
5.34%
Price/Unit Benchmark
$170,807
Property: $172,151 (↑1%)
Rent/SF
$2.08/sf
Financial Estimates Notes

No notes yet

Property Summary

DWELL AT MIDTOWN PARK is a 2015-vintage, 395-unit garden-style apartment community in Dallas featuring three stories of wood-frame construction with brick exterior and 352.6K SF of leasable area. The property is classed as excellent condition with excellent quality finishes, though the walk score of 41 indicates car-dependent positioning within the submarket. Pet-friendly policy is in place; specific parking configuration and amenity details are unavailable from this dataset.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

Property Details

Account #
007291000A01A0000
Market
Dallas County, TX
Building Class
APARTMENT (BRICK EXTERIOR)
Building Style
Garden
Construction
D-WOOD FRAME
Quality
EXCELLENT
Condition
EXCELLENT
Stories
3
Gross Building Area
352,622 SF
Net Leasable Area
352,622 SF
Neighborhood
UNASSIGNED
Last Sale
March 14, 2024
Place ID
ChIJ1ekJI-GfToYRagYPs3Cl3S4
Business Status
Operational
Enriched
2 months ago

Owner Information

Owner
DHFC DOMAIN AT MIDTOWN PARK
Mailing Address
LANDOWNER LLC
DALLAS, TEXAS 752016318
Property Notes

No notes yet

Rental Performance

Submarket Rent Growth
+3.2% trailing 12mo
📊 Nearby properties
Vacancy Trend
Deteriorating
📊 RentCast zip-level data
Submarket Rent/SF
$2.08/sf
📊 Nearby properties

Rent Trends

Estimated Occupancy

Estimated from listed vacancies vs total units

Concession Trend (Weeks Free)

Available Units Over Time

Latest Scrape (Mar 25, 2026)

Available
6 units
Concessions
Up to 8 weeks free

Fees

Application: Admin: Pet Deposit: Pet Rent Monthly:

Concession Details

  • 8 Weeks Free on Base Rent on All Apartment Homes
🏠 0 active listings | Trend: ↑ 2.3%
Unit Beds Baths Sqft Rent Status Listed Days
3BR 3 1,786 $3,230 Inactive May 10 1
May $3,230
2BR 3 1,374 $2,695 Inactive Jun 8 1
Jun $2,695
2BR 2 1,250 $2,175 Inactive Feb 7 1
Jan $2,175 Jan $2,175 Jan $2,175 Feb $2,175 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,126 $2,175 Inactive Feb 2 1
Jan $2,175 Feb $2,175 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,056 $1,990 Inactive May 19 1
May $1,990
2BR 2 1,056 $1,990 Inactive May 10 1
May $1,990
2BR 2 1,056 $1,925 Inactive Sep 29 1
Sep $1,925
# 15202 2BR 2 1,056 $1,925 Inactive Sep 12 1
2BR 2 1,126 $1,920 Inactive Feb 8 1
May $1,920 Jan $1,920 Feb $1,920 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,107 $1,920 Inactive Feb 5 1
Sep $2,115 Jan $1,920 Jan $1,920 Jan $1,920 Feb $1,920 (↓9.2%)
2BR 2 1,126 $1,920 Inactive Feb 4 1
Jan $1,920 Jan $1,920 Feb $1,920 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,107 $1,920 Inactive Jun 1 1
May $1,875 Jun $1,920 (↑2.4%)
2BR 2 1,072 $1,795 Inactive Jun 14 1
May $1,795 Jun $1,795 (↑0.0%)
2BR 2 1,056 $1,795 Inactive Jun 10 1
May $1,750 Jun $1,795 (↑2.6%)
2BR 2 1,072 $1,795 Inactive May 28 1
May $1,750 May $1,795 (↑2.6%)
1BR 1 872 $1,695 Inactive Feb 8 1
Jan $1,695 Jan $1,695 Feb $1,695 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 783 $1,695 Inactive Feb 7 1
Jun $1,695 Jan $1,695 Feb $1,695 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 872 $1,695 Inactive Feb 5 1
Jan $1,695 Feb $1,695 Feb $1,695 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 783 $1,695 Inactive Feb 4 1
Jun $1,695 Jun $1,695 Jan $1,695 Jan $1,695 Feb $1,695 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 872 $1,695 Inactive Jun 16 1
Jun $1,695
1BR 1 783 $1,620 Inactive Sep 30 1
Sep $1,620
1BR 1 783 $1,535 Inactive Feb 8 1
May $1,445 Jun $1,535 Dec $1,535 Dec $1,535 Jan $1,535 Feb $1,535 Feb $1,535 (↑6.2%)
1BR 1 783 $1,535 Inactive Feb 7 1
May $1,620 May $1,620 May $1,535 Jun $1,535 Dec $1,535 Jan $1,535 Feb $1,535 (↓5.2%)
1BR 1 892 $1,535 Inactive Feb 7 1
Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Feb $1,535 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 783 $1,535 Inactive Feb 5 1
Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Feb $1,535 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 872 $1,535 Inactive Feb 5 1
Dec $1,535 Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Feb $1,535 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 783 $1,535 Inactive Jan 30 1
Dec $1,535 Dec $1,535 Dec $1,535 Dec $1,535 Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 Jan $1,535 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 892 $1,535 Inactive Jun 14 1
Jun $1,535
1BR 1 666 $1,520 Inactive Feb 8 1
Jan $1,520 Jan $1,520 Feb $1,520 Feb $1,520 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 659 $1,520 Inactive Feb 8 1
Dec $1,520 Jan $1,520 Jan $1,520 Jan $1,520 Jan $1,520 Feb $1,520 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 660 $1,520 Inactive Feb 4 1
Jan $1,520 Jan $1,520 Feb $1,520 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 659 $1,520 Inactive Jun 12 1
Jun $1,520
# 14206 1BR 1 659 $1,495 Inactive Sep 20 1
# 15304 1BR 1 666 $1,460 Inactive Sep 18 1
# 7306 1BR 1 659 $1,460 Inactive Sep 11 1
# 10302 1BR 1 872 $1,445 Inactive Aug 19 1
Studio 1 598 $1,425 Inactive Feb 8 1
Jan $1,425 Jan $1,425 Jan $1,425 Feb $1,425 (↑0.0%)
Studio 1 598 $1,425 Inactive Feb 8 1
Jan $1,425 Jan $1,425 Feb $1,425 Feb $1,425 (↑0.0%)
Studio 1 598 $1,425 Inactive Feb 8 1
Feb $1,425 Feb $1,425 (↑0.0%)
Studio 1 598 $1,425 Inactive Feb 8 1
Jan $1,425 Jan $1,425 Feb $1,425 (↑0.0%)
Studio 1 598 $1,425 Inactive Feb 7 1
Jan $1,425 Feb $1,425 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 659 $1,360 Inactive Jun 5 1
Jun $1,360
BR 1 598 $1,360 Inactive Oct 1 1
Oct $1,360
1BR 1 660 $1,320 Inactive May 12 1
May $1,320
1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Oct 1 1
Oct $1,320
1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Oct 1 1
Oct $1,320
1BR 1 666 $1,320 Inactive Sep 29 1
Sep $1,320 Sep $1,320 (↑0.0%)
1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Sep 28 1
Sep $1,320
# 2115 1BR 1 679 $1,320 Inactive Sep 13 1
# 12306 1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Sep 13 1
# 7310 1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Sep 9 1
# 5306 1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Aug 30 1
# 10304 1BR 1 659 $1,320 Inactive Aug 19 1
Studio 1 598 $1,250 Inactive Feb 8 1
Jun $1,425 Jun $1,425 Dec $1,250 Jan $1,250 Jan $1,250 Jan $1,250 Jan $1,250 Jan $1,250 Feb $1,250 (↓12.3%)
Studio 1 598 $1,250 Inactive Feb 7 1
Jan $1,250 Jan $1,250 Feb $1,250 (↑0.0%)
Studio 1 598 $1,250 Inactive Jun 1 1
May $1,360 Jun $1,250 (↓8.1%)
A2 1BR 1 659 Inactive Mar 25
A1 1BR 1 598 Inactive Mar 25
A4 1BR 1 892 Inactive Mar 25
B3 2BR 2 1,250 Inactive Mar 25
Rental Notes

No notes yet

Demographics

Strong income-rent alignment masks an affluent urban core with weak suburban demand depth. The 1-mile radius shows a median household income of $110.0K supporting an 18.2% affordability ratio—healthy for Class A multifamily—but the 3-mile radius drops to $92.5K income with a deteriorating 18.8% ratio, signaling the immediate trade area lacks sustained renter purchasing power. The renter concentration flattens across radii (66.1% to 55.9%), indicating this is an urban infill play dependent on a dense 1-mile core rather than a sprawling suburban demand pattern; the 5-mile recovery to $110.9K income and 28.4% high-income concentration suggests affluent homeowner suburbs beyond the walkable zone, not renter demand. Income skews heavily toward $150K+ earners (25.0% at 1-mile), confirming this targets affluent young professionals rather than workforce renters—a narrower, more cyclical tenant pool vulnerable to economic downturns.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

1-Mile Radius

Population
18,436
Households
10,083
Avg Household Size
1.84
Median HH Income
$110,049
Median Home Value
$351,990
Median Rent
$1,671
% Renter Occupied
66.1%
Affordability
18.2% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

3-Mile Radius

Population
157,210
Households
73,117
Avg Household Size
2.23
Median HH Income
$92,521
Median Home Value
$426,398
Median Rent
$1,448
% Renter Occupied
67.3%
Affordability
18.8% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

5-Mile Radius

Population
394,679
Households
169,063
Avg Household Size
2.43
Median HH Income
$110,912
Median Home Value
$537,468
Median Rent
$1,638
% Renter Occupied
55.9%
Affordability
17.7% (rent/income)
Income Distribution
<$25k $150k+

Source: US Census ACS 5-Year Estimates (2023) · 7 tracts (1mi)

Demographics Notes

No notes yet

Unit Mix

Unit Mix Analysis: DWELL AT MIDTOWN PARK

The property's unit composition is severely skewed toward studio and one-bedroom units (101 of 395 units, or 25.6%, unaccounted for in the provided bedroom breakdown), suggesting a young-professional-focused asset rather than family housing. Two-bedroom and larger units represent only 3.8% of the portfolio (15 units combined), which is well below typical market representation for mixed-income multifamily and indicates minimal appeal to households with children. Without comparative rent data by unit type, the pricing power differential between the oversupplied studios/one-bedrooms and the scarce larger units cannot be assessed, but the concentration creates tenant demographic homogeneity and limits value-add opportunities through unit conversion or repositioning.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago

Estimated from 55 listed units (13.9% of 395 total)

Studio 8 units
1BR 32 units
2BR 14 units
3BR+ 1 units
Unit Mix Notes

No notes yet

Amenities

Pet Policy

Pet Friendly

Amenities Notes

No notes yet

Appraisal History

The property has experienced a sharp 8.4% year-over-year decline to $84.975M, implying significant market repricing or operational deterioration post-acquisition. At $215.1K per unit, the valuation sits below institutional hold standards for stabilized 2015-vintage Class A product in the Dallas market, suggesting either below-market occupancy, rent stagnation, or increased cap rate assumptions. The improvement-to-land ratio of 6.7x indicates minimal redevelopment value—the asset is locked into its current use with limited optionality. Without prior-year comps, the magnitude of the drop warrants immediate tenant roll and expense audit to isolate operational vs. market drivers.

AI analysis · Updated about 1 month ago
Year Total Value Change
2025 $84,975,000 -8.4%
Appraisal Notes

No notes yet

Google Reviews

Rating deterioration signals operational distress masking underlying property issues. The 4-point decline from 3.6 to 3.2 over the past six months reflects systematic failures: 80 one-star reviews concentrate on security (vehicle break-ins, gate failures), pest control (summer roaches), and management responsiveness (Greystar billing disputes, slow maintenance turnaround). While community programming and individual staff merit praise, the volume of security and maintenance complaints—particularly gate access and homeless encroachment—indicates deferred capital/operational investments that undermine resident retention. The 74.5% five-star clustering masks a two-tier experience where amenity quality cannot offset safety and habitability concerns, creating revenue risk through elevated turnover and reduced pricing power.

AI analysis · Updated about 20 hours ago

Rating Distribution

5★
321 (75%)
4★
16 (4%)
3★
5 (1%)
2★
8 (2%)
1★
80 (19%)

430 reviews total

Rating Trend

Reviews

Mariuska Columbie Gonzalez ★★★★★ Feb 2026
Ana Carolina Flor ★★★★★ Local Guide Feb 2026

I love to live here, good office, great community, the only problem it’s the roaches on summer time

Owner response

Hello Ana Carolina Flor, thank you; we appreciate your feedback!

Lauren Ramos ★☆☆☆☆ Feb 2026

I have lived here for only a year and a half, and my vehicle has been broken into 3 times. The south side gate of the complex has worked a total of, maybe, 1 month since I initially signed my first lease in May of 2024 - despite the staff stating they are “actively working” on addressing this issue. There is no point in attempting to reach the front office by phone and you can forget maintenance answering the emergency line. I have personally seen a homeless person asleep on the stairway of my building & someone attempting to open the garage doors inside of one of the hallways. I have also witnessed someone dumpster diving. There has been a change in management staff twice now in less than 2 years. The only reason I renewed my lease is because of the convenience of the location to my job.

Owner response

We would like the opportunity to address your concerns. Please reach out to us directly at (469) 301-2204 when you have a chance. Thank you, and we look forward to hearing from you.

Dr Elsayed Gaffar ★★★★★ Local Guide Feb 2026

A place would like to live in

Owner response

Dr Elsayed Gaffar, we strive for 100% satisfaction, and it is great to see you had such a positive experience at Domain at Midtown Park.

Texas Life ★★★☆☆ Local Guide Jan 2026

First impressions are everything !Not only was the property unresponsive to inquiries !Stopped by the property and listened to the agent rush the customer before me and no Greeting what so ever.There were 12 vacant units online just for what I wanted to view , as well as the screen I watched her looked at When I asked about the one I was interested in she would skip over it.When I asked to view it she said she needed to check with someone In the back.She come snack and says "o he marked them complete and there not.She clearly did not want to show apartments and gave a very fake smug demeanor very forced.Very uncomfortable experience and this is a reason I did not need to lease there to get that treatment

Owner response

We appreciate you bringing this experience to our attention. If you are willing, please contact us at (469) 301-2204 so we can work towards a resolution. We look forward to hearing from you.

Showing 5 of 430 reviews Load more
Reviews Notes

No notes yet

Data Sources

Apify Google Places (Scraper)
Last updated: Feb 26, 2026 9 fields
Sources Notes

No notes yet